Should the equality sign between ER and EPR?

SHOULD THE EQUALITY SIGN BETWEEN THE PHENOMENA OF QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT "EPR" AND "ER BRIDGE"?

Kulak L.A. (Antoniya Ilyinskaya)

Member of the International Academy of Information Technologies PU IAIT. Engineer, independent researcher in the field of Fractal Synthesis and Linguistic Physics of the corresponding sector of the International Institute of Humanitarian and Ecological Projects (IHEP) as part of the International Academy of Information Technologies (IAIT). Florida, USA. Toronto, Canada. Minsk, Belarus.
Email: antoniyau@yahoo.com

"Quantum physics urgently needs new images and ideas that can only arise from a profound revision of the principles underlying it."
Nobel laureate Louis de Broglie.

ABSTRACT.

In physics, as known, there are two theoretical proposals: quantum entanglement and "wormholes". Quantum entanglement was predicted within the framework of quantum mechanics and describes the connection between distant elementary particles beyond the standard interactions. "Wormholes" were predicted within the framework of the General Theory of Relativity (GTR) and are "tunnels" connecting distant parts of space-time.
Historically, these phenomena have been given names made up of the first letters of the surnames of the authors of the articles in which these theoretical proposals were first published: quantum entanglement is called "EPR", and space tunnels are called "ER bridges".
This article proposes to return to the beginning of the emergence of these theoretical proposals and to the original sources in which these proposals were put forward. Based on the analysis, it is shown that in subsequent reasoning, incorrect conclusions were historically made, which entailed a corresponding logical chain of judgments based on the apparatus of algebra, which led to a hypothetical proposal about the equivalence of the "EPR" effect and the "ER bridge".
In this paper, a geometric solution to this issue is proposed based on the ontology of the complementarity principle. The author applied a geometric analogue of the complementarity principle of the Mobius strip to visualize the process of filamentary splitting of the "quantum object" and demonstrate the formation of those interrelations that are actualized during fibration of the magnetic loop. The form representation of the magnetic loop is considered based on natural complementary duality, which geometrically contains an inverse turn of 180 degrees and represents a mirror-asymmetric relationship of the components of a single whole.
Geometrical transformations clearly demonstrate the functional difference between the "EPR" effect and the "ER bridge" and lead to the resolution of the question of their equivalence. The content of this article is a more condensed version of the content of the mentioned works. [28] [31] [32] [33] [34]

"We must not allow all other cognitive organs to degenerate through the development of rational analysis alone." Nobel laureate W. Heisenberg.

In 2013, Juan Maldac;n of Princeton University and Leonard Susskind of Stanford University published a paper proposing the equivalence of two completely different phenomena: the "EPR" effect and the "ER bridge". [1]
This proposed equivalence exists for now as a hypothesis and is attractive because it has led to the consequences that, using the mathematical apparatus of algebra, repeated attempts are made to prove that the "EPR" effect and the "ER bridge" are equivalent. [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
THE FULL VERSION OF THIS ARTICLE READ https://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0016/001k/00165974.htm