Virtual International Symposium
"The future: technology or meaning?"
Part 2.
Hypothetical discussion: Vladimir Lermontov and Peter Thiel on the future
Moderator. Dear guests, today we have a rare dialogue: on the one hand — Vladimir Lermontov, author of the teaching "yoga-the practice of the Great Unity of Aham" and the concept of "nuclear philosophy" as the ethical core of civilization; on the other hand — Peter Thiel, entrepreneur, investor, thinker on technology and institutions. Topic: "The future of humanity: technology or meaning?"
I will introduce the participants of the dialog.
________________________________________
Vladimir Lermontov aka Mahadev Vedaham Dorjal. Writer, traveler, researcher of ancient civilizations. Author of the concept of "nuclear philosophy" and the teaching "yoga-the practice of the Great Unity "Aham"". In the center of his ideas is overcoming the disunity of humanity. He talks about "nuclear ethics": extremely simple and unshakable principles (unity, overcoming the dualism of "I/the world", ethics as a daily practice — "Tell the Truth, Do the Truth, Pray for the Truth"), around which society can gather. Personal responsibility is important: if "You are the Truth," then every action either enhances the light or feeds the darkness. "Aham"yoga combines inner work (meditation, sacred dances) with external responsibility — ethics, "dharma-science", "dharma-politics" (politics based on universal ethical principles, not on the interests of groups). In his rhetoric, the idea of "axial time 2.0" is often heard: in the face of global challenges, we need an answer that covers all of humanity and simultaneously begins with each person.
Peter Thiel —is a truly controversial figure: a successful tech entrepreneur, venture capitalist, and thinker with a very specific, Contrarian view of the world. I picked out the key facets of his biography, business approach, and philosophy.
Biography and career
• Origin and education. Born in Frankfurt am Main, he moved to the United States as a child. At Stanford, he received a bachelor's degree in twentieth-century philosophy, and later a doctorate in law. As a student, he founded The Stanford Review, a conservative political newspaper.
• Key projects. Together with Max Levchin, he created the PayPal payment system. Later invested in Facebook at an early stage. In 2003, he founded Palantir — a big data analytics company with clients including intelligence agencies and the US Army. In 2005ñîó÷ðåäèë, he co-founded the Founders Fundventure capital fund. He also launched the Mithril Fund for later-stage investments.
• Informal influence. In Silicon Valley, Thiel is known as the" don of the PayPal mafia": he became the center of an informal community of entrepreneurs who left the company.
Business approach
• Contrarianism. Thiel searches for "truths that others disagree with" - this is what often leads to breakthrough investments. He is looking not just for good ideas, but for radically new ones that break the established rules of the game.
• Observations. For example, he noticed that the success of a startup often correlates with the low salary of the founder.
• Criticism of the system. Thiel is skeptical of a number of institutions. In particular, he believes that higher education is highly overvalued: according to his calculations, a significant part of universities do not give a positive return on investment. In 2010, he launched the Thiel Fellowship program Fellowship: young people under the age of 22 with a clear product idea are offered $100,000 for two years, provided that they leave college and fully devote themselves to creating a new one.
Philosophical and political views
There are especially many reasons for discussion here.
• ÀãåíòíîñòüAgency and the future. Thiel is convinced that the future is not predetermined, people are able to consciously shape it through purposeful actions. At the same time, he believes that the greatest risk is not in mistakes, but in inaction.
• Artificial intelligence. Thiel sees advancedAI as the main engine of progress and fears stagnation. At the same time, he sharply criticizes calls for strict state regulation: in his opinion, this will lead not to security, but to the creation of a totalitarian system that will control technology and suppress freedom. He is concerned about the idea of a one — world government that will try to regulate AI-he calls this a "blind atheistic option." In his lectures, he drew parallels between such regulators and the figure of the Antichrist, who uses the fear of existential risks (AI, climate) to seize power.
• Criticism of trends. He is skeptical of certain areas of contemporary discourse, such as climate activism (sometimes referring to individual activists as "legionnaires of the Antichrist") or what he sees as an overemphasis on multiculturalism and race issues.
• Political activity. Thiel openly supported Donald Trump and participated in his transition team. His political views are often described as libertarian, but with nuances: he does not just want a smaller state, but is looking for a specific model where technology and the state work in synergy.
• Other interests. He is also interested in life extension technologies and achieving technological immortality.
Moderator. Participants will now submit their manifestos.
Peter Thiel's manifesto for the symposium " The Future of Humanity: Technology or Meaning?"
Introduction
The question before us is false in its dichotomy. We don't choose between technology and meaning — we choose what meaning we put in the technology and what technology, in turn, generates our meaning. I do not write this as a denier, but as someone who sees in this tension the source of the sharpest challenge and the most daring opportunity.
Abstracts
1. Technology is not a tool, but an extension of the human will. It reflects our values, fears, and ambitions. Therefore, the main question is not " what can we do?", but "what kind of person and what kind of society do we want as a result?".
2. Stagnation is the main threat. I call" anti-growth " trends that stifle innovation: excessive regulation, the cult of security, and the rejection of risk as the norm. Overcoming stagnation requires the courage to go against the flow.
3. A breakthrough is born out of a"secret". A true technological leap begins with an intuition that contradicts conventional wisdom. Look not just for a need, but for a hidden truth about the future — something that others are missing out on.
4. AI is a key milestone. The development of artificial intelligence sets the tone for the next era. It is not only about efficiency, but also about the nature of the mind, about where the boundary between the tool and the subject lies.vk.ru +1
5. Meaning without technology is doomed to passivity. Technology provides the means to implement great ideas-from overcoming diseases to exploring new spaces. But without a clear moral compass, these tools can be used to their detriment. We need a synthesis: bold goals and responsible tools.
6. Don't avoid taking risks. Many great shifts have been accompanied by uncertainty and even disasters. Risk aversion often paralyzes progress more than the technological challenges themselves.
7. Discuss the existential stakes. If we bet on overcoming mortality, expanding cognitive capabilities, or colonizing other worlds, this changes the very question of human destiny.
8. Local and global are not mutually exclusive. Large-scale projects require coordination, but they are based in local communities where trust and a common goal are formed.
Conclusion
I urge you not to choose between technology and meaning, but to engage in a dialogue. Let the symposium become a platform where engineers, philosophers, artists and politicians will draw a map together: what technologies we really want to generate and what image of man and humanity is behind it. The future is not prescribed — it is invented.
Sincerely, Peter Thiel
Vladimir Lermontov's manifesto for the international Symposium "The Future of Humanity: Technology or Meaning?"
Introduction
We are on the threshold of a great choice. On the one hand, there is a technological vortex that promises to reshape the very nature of man. On the other — the call of eternal meaning, a reminder that man is created in the image and likeness of the Supreme, and this is his main truth. I'm not calling for rejecting technology. On the contrary, I urge you to fill them with meaning, so that they serve not to destroy the image of a person, but to reveal it.
Let the "nuclear philosophy" become the ethical core around which we will build the future of the world of truth and justice. Let "Pravdaria" be not an escape from reality, but an affirmation of a higher order of things — Dharmapolitics, where justice is not only a right, but also compliance with cosmic and moral laws.
________________________________________
Abstracts
1. Meaning is primary, technology is a tool.
Technology without meaning is blind and dangerous. It can lift us up to the stars — and at the same time wipe us off the face of the earth. Meaning sets the direction: for what we go into space, for what we create AI, for what we build cities. In the practice of Aham, we say, " You are the Truth." So, any creation must begin with an internal question: does it correspond to the higher nature of man?
2. The "Great Nothing" as the basis of existence.
We call the "Great Nothingness" dark energy and dark matter — the very physical reality on which all manifestation rests. This is not an abstraction, but a reminder: behind the visible world lies a deep foundation from which everything is born. When we know it scientifically, we simultaneously touch the eternal. Let science and spirituality not argue, but conduct a dialogue.
3. Pravdaria Project: civilization of the dawn.
"Pravdaria" is a planetary rush in which breakthrough technologies serve a higher purpose. This is a prototype city, where architecture, energy, and cognitive practices are designed to support the divine nature of a person. Let it become a model not only for Earth, but also for future settlements on Mars: if we learn to live ethically here,we can survive there.
4. Dharmapolitics as a new management principle.
The politics of the future should be Dharmapolitics: not a struggle of interests, but a service to a higher order. This means that any decision-from the law to the AI algorithm-passes an ethical test: does it strengthen justice, protect human dignity, and serve the common good?
5. "A little man with a big heart" is a pillar of civilization.
It's not just geniuses and leaders who make history. It is created by millions of ordinary people, in whose hearts lives conscience, compassion and the desire for truth. In Pravdaria, the voice of the "little man" is not drowned out by the noise of technology — it is built into the system as the most important signal. Let everyone have the right to question, to offer, to pause to hear themselves.
6. A moment of silence as an engineering requirement.
Before every important decision — whether it's launching an algorithm or passing a law-there should be a pause. Five minutes of silence to hear not only the data, but also the voice of conscience. This is not a ritual, but a protocol of sustainability: a civilization that does not know how to stop to listen is doomed to self-destruction.
7. Yoga of Great Unity "Aham": the practice of the inner cosmos.
Outer space exploration begins with inner space exploration. The practice of" Aham " teaches: before changing the world, you need to establish yourself in your true nature. Let self-discovery technologies become a priority along with energy and communication technologies. After all, true happiness is not in endless consumption, but in reconnecting with the eternal.
8. Ethical filter for AI and algorithms.
Artificial intelligence should not be a "black box", but a transparent assistant that enhances humanity, and does not replace it. It is based on an "ethical filter": the algorithm cannot recommend an action that contradicts the principles of Dharmapolitics. Let the AI search for optimal solutions — but only in the space outlined by conscience.
9. Opposition tofuturocide: preserving the human image.
The main catastrophic damage to technological projects is not economic or environmental, but anthropological: the disappearance of man as the bearer of truth and spiritual life. We must put up a barrier tofuturocide-practices that erase human nature under the guise of progress. The future must be human — or it doesn't need to be at all.
10. Collective intention as a transformative force.
When millions of people simultaneously strive for the same goal — peace, justice, truth-it changes not only society, but also the very fabric of reality. Let the World Day of Spiritual Unity become a regular practice that forms the" turning points " of history.
________________________________________
Conclusion
I encourage all participants to move beyond the false "technology or meaning"dichotomy. Let's create a future where technology serves meaning, where science hears wisdom, and where progress is measured not only by speed, but also by depth. Let "Pravdaria" become a symbol of this synthesis: a city where every stone, every algorithm, every law reminds a person of his higher destiny.
Let even the quietest voice be heard. Even if the smallest heart with a big truth can influence the course of history. After all, it is precisely from such quiet, honest steps that a real civilization is born — not from loud slogans, but from daily loyalty to the truth.
Sincerely,
Vladimir Lermontov
________________________________________
Moderator: Now let's start the dialog.
Peter Thiel. I'll start with a simpleone: the future is about acceleration. We live in an era where the speed of change determines survival. If you don't accelerate, you disappear. Technologies are not just tools, they are a new human nature. Artificial intelligence, biotechnology, space-all this expands the boundaries of what is possible. And if we slow down progress because of abstract fears, we will lose out to those who are not afraid to move forward.
Vladimir Lermontov. You talk about acceleration, Peter, but you forget to ask: where are we accelerating to? If the car rushes into the abyss, speed is not an achievement, but a disaster. My "nuclear philosophy" is just about the core: about what should remain unchanged, even when everything around you changes. This is the ethical core-truth, justice, unity. Without it, any technological miracle becomes dangerous.
Peter Thiel. But is ethics something that can be fixed? Ethics change with society. What was considered right a hundred years ago may look archaic today. Technology isn't just changing the world — it's also changing how we think about good and evil. For example, life extension: previously it was a miracle, now it is an engineering task. And this changes the very moral: if we can defeat death, should we do it?
Vladimir Lermontov. That is why I am talking about the "civilization of dawn — - a synthesis of ethics, philosophy, art, culture, creativity and technology. Not about stopping progress, but about directing it. Technology without a spiritual dimension loses its soul. Imagine: you have built a perfect city on Mars, but there is no place for silence, for contemplation, for inner search. It will not be a city, but a prison made of glass and metal.
Peter Thiel. But I see another danger: if we think too much about the "soul", we risk losing reality. Technology solves real problems: hunger, disease, and poverty. Yes, they can be used for evil, but this is a matter of managing them, not rejecting them. I believe in the power of innovation to make the world a better place, even if it seems cold or soulless.
Vladimir Lermontov. But would the world be a better place if man, created in the image and likeness of God, disappeared from it? It's not a metaphor, Peter, it's a truth that we have no right to lose. Technological projects that obliterate the humancause major catastrophic damage. My practice of "Aham" is just about returning a person to his true dimension — unity with the world, with himself, with the higher principle.
Peter Thiel. You talk about the higher beginning, and I talk about concrete solutions. Yes, technology can be dangerous, but abandoning it is also a risk. We don't have the luxury of standing still. The future is not a choice between technology and meaning, it is a search for balance. And this balance is achieved through action, through experimentation, through mistakes and corrections.
Vladimir Lermontov. The balance you are talking about is possible only when there is a core — unchangeable, ethical, spiritual. Without it, any experiments lead to emptiness. The Pravdaria Nuclear Project is an attempt to create such a core: a place where technology serves not destruction, but creation, where every step is checked for compliance with truth and justice.
Peter Thiel. Still, I don't believe in fixed truths. The world is too complex to find one universal formula. The future is a lot of parallel paths, competition of ideas, selection of the best solutions. And technology is the main tool for this selection.
Vladimir Lermontov. Then let's imagine two scenarios. In one thing, technologies develop without a spiritual guide, and we get a world where a person is only a function of the system. In another — we are creating a "civilization of the dawn", where technology is an extension of the human spirit, and not its replacement. I choose the second way. And I believe that even the weakest, but sincere voice can be at the forefront — as it is said in Lao Tzu: "The weakest wins the strongest."
Peter Thiel. Perhaps this has its own beauty. But I still bet on the action. Let there be different paths, let ideas compete. The main thing is not to stop. The future is not waiting for those who are afraid to make a move.
Vladimir Lermontov. And let this step be meaningful. Let the question stand behind every technological breakthrough: "Does it make the world a fairer, more humane place?"
Moderator. Thank you, dear interlocutors. We heard two different but equally strong positions: one about the power of technology and the need to move forward, and the other about the importance of the ethical core and spiritual dimension. Perhaps the future is a dialogue between them.
Vladimir Lermontov. It is necessary to develop the technology of self-knowledge, to master the inner, boundless universe, this gives a person true, absolute happiness, technology will never give a person happiness.
Moderator. Thank you, Vladimir, for this thought. It sounds like a challenge to the usual logic of progress. Peter, how do you respond to the thesis that true happiness is born not from technology, but from mastering the inner universe?
Peter Thiel. I hear romanticism in this, and it has its own value-it reminds us that a person is not only an engineer, but also a poet. But let's look at the reality: millions of people suffer from disease, poverty, and violence. Technology provides the tools to remove these basic sources of unhappiness. Yes, they do not guarantee absolute happiness, but they create a space where a person can think about the "inner universe" at all. Without a roof over your head and without food, self-discovery is a luxury available to a few.
Vladimir Lermontov. And I don't deny the need for a roof and bread. But I'm talking about priority. We can build the safest and most comfortable bunker, but if a person in it forgets how to hear himself, he will cease to be a person. Self-discovery technology is not a luxury, it is the foundation. In my practice of Aham, we say, " You are the Truth." This is not an abstraction: this is an invitation to inner exploration, to see the boundless universe within you. This is where true, absolute happiness is born-not as a reaction to external circumstances, but as an internal state of unity.
Peter Thiel. But how to scale this "internal state"? Do you suggest that everyone go into meditation while the world solves its problems? We have limited resources, and we need to choose where to invest them: in vaccines, in energy, in artificial intelligence, which can save millions of lives. And "technology of self-discovery" sounds like an individual project. How will it help society as a whole?
Vladimir Lermontov. It helps precisely as a technology — as a reproducible practice. Yoga, meditation, contemplation, working with images — all these are techniques that can be transmitted, taught, and integrated into the culture. In nuclear philosophy, I call this the "ethical core": if a society relies on people who can hear themselves and others, it will become more resilient. Not because we will abandon vaccines, but because we will ask the question: for whom and for what do we create them? Technology without an internal reference point can also serve destruction.
Imagine: we have created a super-powerful AI. Who will decide how to use it? The one who sees only resources and markets in the world-or the one who feels responsible for life, for the future, for the truth? This is where "self-discovery technology"comes in: it forms a person capable of making ethically mature decisions.
Peter Thiel. In other words, you propose to educate the "new person" as the basis for progress?
Vladimir Lermontov. Exactly. But not through coercion, but through disclosure. In the teaching of the Great Unity "Aham" there is no place for suppressing the personality — on the contrary, it opens it up to a cosmic scale. Each person is a microcosm, the whole universe is contained in it. When we master this inner infinity, we are no longer cogs in the system. We become sources of light that can change the world. And then even the most "cold" technology becomes a tool for good.
Let us recall the words of Lao Tzu: "The weakest overcomes the strongest." This is not about physical strength, but about inner resilience, the ability to stay true to the truth. "The stone rejected by the builders will become the centerpiece tomorrow." Such a" stone " can be a quiet voice of conscience, an internal search, the practice of self-knowledge.
Peter Thiel. This has its own logic. If we want technology to serve humanity, and not vice versa, we need people with a strong ethical position. But I still insist: you can't wait for everyone to become wise. We need to act now. Let two processes run in parallel: the development of technology and the education of the inner dimension. Let them compete, complement each other, test each other for strength.
Vladimir Lermontov. I agree with parallelism. But I insist on hierarchy: the ethical core must be primary. Otherwise, we run the risk of getting a world where everything works perfectly, and the person in it is empty. The Pravdaria Nuclear Project offers just such a hierarchy: first — the core of truth and justice, then-the technologies that serve this core. Then the "singularity" you are talking about will not be the end of man, but his new flourishing.
Peter Thiel. The "singularity" is a challenge, not a sentence. It all depends on who will be at the helm of this process. If these are people who have passed through your "self-discovery technology", perhaps we will really have a chance for a bright future. I do not promise that I will practice yoga, but I am willing to admit that without an ethical dimension, progress is dangerous.
Vladimir Lermontov. I'm not asking you to become a yogi. I ask only one thing: that every technological project should include the question: "Does this make a person more human?" If we ask this question, we are already on the way to the"civilization of dawn". And then even the smallest person with a big heart will be able to influence the course of history.
Moderator. So the two poles converged: action and meaning, speed and depth. Perhaps the future lies precisely in the ability to keep this balance: to build rockets and at the same time learn to hear the silence inside yourself. Thank you for this dialogue — it showed that even with fundamental differences, you can find common ground.
Vladimir Lermontov. Let's talk about happiness, because to be happy is the most important purpose of a person, in what you see happiness, I see it in that a person dissolves into eternity, finds immortality in the spirit.
Moderator. Vladimir, you speak of immortality in the spirit as the essence of happiness. This is a very strong image. Peter, what do you say to this understanding of human destiny?
Peter Thiel. I hear in this the desire to overcome borders — and in this we are, perhaps, closer than it seems. I also believe that a person should not put up with the limits that are imposed on him. Only I see overcoming differently: not as a departure into the eternity of the spirit, but as an expansion of opportunities in the real world. Immortality in my understanding is not a metaphysical category, but an engineering task: to defeat aging, to defeat death with the help of science and technology. For me, happiness is when a person has a chance to live not just one short life, but dozens, hundreds of years, to have time to do more, to see how the world is changing, and to change it himself.
Vladimir Lermontov. And therein lies the main trap: you want to extend your life, but you don't ask what it will be like. You can live a thousand years blind to your own soul, and then it will not be immortality, but endless suffering. Happiness is not in the number of years lived, but in the quality of the inner state. In the practice of Aham, we say, " Everything is an illusion, but the truth is that You are the Truth." This is an invitation to awakening: when a person comes into contact with this inner "You", he finds true freedom and happiness-regardless of the length of his earthly life. Immortality here is not the infinite existence of the body, but the continuity of the spirit: when something awakens in a person that does not die. This is the "parting from eternity": not an escape from time, but an exit beyond it through an inner transformation.
Peter Thiel. But how can this inner transformation be measured? How to make sure that it is real, and not just a beautiful idea? In technologies, we have metrics: speed, efficiency, and results. And here — only personal feelings. I do not deny the value of the inner world, but without relying on objective criteria, it is easy to go into self-deception.
Vladimir Lermontov. There are criteria, Peter, but they are not external, but internal. In nuclear philosophy, we call this "ethical resonance": when your actions, thoughts, and feelings begin to resound in unison with the ultimate truth. This is not an abstraction — it is a state that changes behavior: a person stops lying, stops causing pain, begins to act out of love and responsibility. And this can be seen in the fruits: in relationships, in the family, in society. Happiness here is when you live in harmony with yourself and the world, when your every action becomes a continuation of the truth.
And another important point: immortality in the spirit is not about loneliness. This is about communication. In the Great Unity teaching of Aham, the "I" is not the ego, but the " I am Inthe se." When a person realizes this unity, he ceases to be separate, and his love, his work, his creativity begin to serve the whole. Even the smallest person with a big heart becomes part of the eternal flow of life. That's why I believe in the power of the "little man": his quiet, sincere actions can change the world more than any grandiose projects without a soul.
Peter Thiel. You talk about serving the whole, and I think about creating a new one. For me, happiness is in creating, in leaving a mark that will be visible not only in the memory of people, but also in the very structure of the world: in new cities, in new technologies, in new opportunities. Perhaps our paths lead to the same goal, but in different ways: you raise a person who does not want to destroy the world, and I build a world in which a person will have more chances to prove himself.
Vladimir Lermontov. Then let's connect these roads. Imagine: a person who has passed the path of self-knowledge takes up technology not for power or profit, but for the service of truth and justice. The "Nuclear Project Pravdaria" is precisely the point of connection: the ethical core around which all technologies revolve. And then immortality becomes not only personal, but also collective: we leave behind not just buildings and algorithms, but a culture of truth that will live in the hearts of people.
Let us recall the same wisdom of Lao Tzu: "The weakest defeats the strongest." The weak one here is the quiet voice of conscience, it is an inner knowledge that does not shout, but sounds forever. And when a society begins to hear this voice, it becomes really strong — not at the expense of the power of weapons or capital, but at the expense of the power of the spirit.
Peter Thiel. This has its own beauty. And, perhaps, such a synthesis is the most stable way. Let there be both technology and ethics. Let engineers build the future, and philosophers and practitioners help them not to lose their humanity. I do not promise that I will accept your understanding of immortality as the only correct one, but I am willing to admit that without the inner dimension, even the greatest creation can be empty.
Vladimir Lermontov. And I'm not asking you to give up technology. All I ask is that every great project has room for a quiet question: "Does this make the world a fairer, more human, happier place?" If we ask this question, we are well on our way to a future where technology and spirit go hand in hand. And then happiness will become not a rare exception, but the norm of human life.
Moderator. Thank you both. Today we have heard two views on happiness and immortality: one through the expansion of external possibilities, the other through the opening of the inner dimension. And, perhaps, the future of humanity lies precisely in the ability to keep this balance: to build new worlds and at the same time preserve what makes us human.
Vladimir Lermontov. Have you ever wondered what happened to the high-tech civilizations of the past? There are pyramids, but no builders. What happened to the builders, architects, who owned technologies that we can only dream about so far? My belief is that they have reached the cosmic level of technology, but their spiritual degradation has led them to physical extinction. This is the first, and the second - all scientific, technological discoveries people made in a special state of consciousness, it came to them from above, and therefore yoga will allow you to step beyond the current technological capabilities. Technology is an abyss, a black hole, and I believe that you need to dive into it with insurance-a rope that is tied to God, truth,dharma, otherwise we will disappear, turn into dust like ancient highly developed civilizations-we will build pyramids, and we will die out.
Moderator. Vladimir, you paint an almost apocalyptic picture: great technologies - and disappeared builders. It's a strong image that makes you think. Peter, how do you see it?
Peter Thiel. I respect the scale of your thinking, but from a historical point of view, the disappearance of civilizations is usually explained not by "spiritual degradation", but by quite material reasons: climate change, resource depletion, wars, epidemics. Pyramids stand because they are stone, but people don't, because they are fragile. Technology alone does not kill — it kills mistakes in management, in resource allocation, in survival strategies.
Yes, we don't know all the details about the ancient builders, but I'm not ready to conclude that their loss of connection with the "higher"was what killed them. Rather, they have failed to meet the challenges of the environment — and this is precisely the task of technology: to learn how to predict and mitigate such blows. If we want to avoid their fate, we need not look back on myths, but build sustainability systems: energy, food, medicine, protection from disasters.
Vladimir Lermontov. You reduce everything to management and resources, Peter, and there's a pragmatism to it. But I'm talking about the root of the problem: why does civilization make such mistakes? Why is it draining resources, starting wars, and not seeing the impending catastrophe? Because her mind narrowed to "I want", "I need", "we are stronger". This is spiritual degradation — the loss of a sense of proportion, responsibility, unity with the world.
The ancient pyramid builders may have had knowledge that we can't even understand now. But if their inner compass broke, if they stopped hearing the "voice of truth", then any, even the greatest technology became a weapon against them. Remember: there is a principle in dharmapolitics — power without righteousness destroys the one who possesses it. That's why I say technology is an abyss. It is possible to dive into it and not come up again, if there is no rope tied to the truth.
And another important point: all the major discoveries in the history of mankind were born not in a state of fuss and competition, but in a state of deep inner peace. Archimedes realized about the displacement of water when he lay in the bath and did not think about anything. Newton saw the apple when he was alone. Einstein spoke of a "cosmic religious feeling" — the very state when a person feels part of the whole. It is from this state that true creativity comes. Yoga, meditation, and the practice of "Aham" is not an escape from the world, but a training of the mind so that it can see beyond the usual horizon.
Peter Thiel. Let's say the internal state is important for insight. But insight is only a spark. It takes years of work, teams, labs, money, and infrastructure to turn it into a technology. And this is where the real work begins — not in silence, but in the clash of ideas, in competition, in testing hypotheses. Yes, inspiration can come in peace, but implementation requires effort.
I do not deny the value of practices that expand consciousness. But my fear is different: if we rely only on the "inner light", we risk losing the ability to act. History doesn't wait for everyone to become enlightened. We need to build systems that work even when people are imperfect.
Vladimir Lermontov. And I'm not suggesting that you give up the action, Peter. On the contrary, I suggest making the action meaningful. Imagine: a team of engineers who go through a short mindfulness practice before each decision. Not for "enlightenment", but to remove the noise of the ego, to hear not only your ambitions, but also the voice of reality. Then their projects will be not only effective, but also safe for humans and the planet.
In nuclear philosophy, we call this an "ethical filter": any technological solution should be tested for the question: "Does this make the world more just and humane?" If so, we move on. If not, we'll review it. This is the very rope: it does not interfere with movement, it insures against falling into the abyss.
Let us recall the words from the practice of "Aham": "You are the Truth." This is not a call to self-confidence, but a reminder: inside each of us there is a fulcrum that does not depend on external circumstances. If we rely on it, we can build pyramids without repeating the fate of their builders.
Peter Thiel. In this formulation, I can agree with you: we need a filter, a system of responsibility. In business, we call it risk management. Only I would not tie the rope to "God or dharma", but to verifiable values: human rights, ecosystem sustainability, long-term security. Let it be not metaphysics, but a code of ethics that can be embedded in development processes.
But I still stand by my point: you can't wait for the ideal state of consciousness to start acting. We must build protective systems now, even if people are imperfect. Let two processes run in parallel: technology development and awareness-raising. Let them test each other.
Vladimir Lermontov. So be it, Peter. Let "risk management" be our common language. But let this term be based not just on calculating losses, but on caring for the person. Let this code include not only numbers, but also a sense of proportion, compassion, and responsibility to future generations.
After all, in the end, the question is not who is right — a technocrat or a mystic. The question is whether we want to leave behind only pyramids of glass and metal — or a living civilization where technology serves truth, justice, and happiness. "The stone rejected by the builders will become the centerpiece tomorrow." This stone can be a simple human heart that remembers: the main thing is not to build the tallest building, but to keep the light in it.
Peter Thiel. You know how to find words that make you think. I will not argue with the fact that technology should serve people. And if the practices you're talking about help people stay human, so be it. The main thing is that we should not forget: the future is built not only in meditation, but also in the laboratory, in the factory, in the code. Let these worlds not be hostile, but cooperate.
Moderator. Today we saw two views of the same abyss: one looks into it with anxiety for the soul, the other-with the calculation of an engineer. And perhaps it is in this tension that the future is born: where technology gives strength, and ethics and inner workings give direction. Thank you for this dialogue — it showed that even with different starting points, you can search for a common language for the sake of a common future.
Vladimir Lermontov. I propose to combine our projects
Moderator. Unexpected offer… Vladimir, are you really ready to combine such different approaches?
Vladimir Lermontov. Yes, Peter. Not to erase the differences, but to strengthen both directions. Let it be your power to build, and my power to remind you why we build. In "nuclear philosophy" there is an image: fire and a vessel. Technology is fire: it warms and illuminates, but it can also burn. And ethics, the practice of self-knowledge, is a vessel: it holds the fire, gives it a form and purpose. Separately, they are dangerous: a fire without a vessel is destruction, a vessel without fire is emptiness. Together, they create light.
I propose to create a joint project: "Civilization of Dawn". It will have two wings. The first is technological: laboratories, prototypes, and engineering solutions that you can run. The second is ethical and practical: mindfulness programs, an "ethical filter" for each project, and training teams in the state of inner peace from which real discoveries come. We will not require engineers to become yogis, but we will give them simple practices to remove the ego noise and hear the voice of truth.
And let the focus be on the concept of a "little man with a big heart": not a lone hero, but an ordinary person who changes the system with his quiet, honest choice. We will create platforms where anyone can suggest an idea, and it will be tested not only for effectiveness, but also for humanity.
Peter Thiel. It sounds like an ambitious synthesis. To be honest, I prefer the language of metrics, deadlines, and results. But I see it as a practical benefit. If teams make fewer mistakes due to ego, if the number of short — sighted decisions decreases, if the long-term sustainability of projects increases-this is not a philosophy, this is an economy. This reduces the risks.
So I'm willing to give it a try. But on my terms: no abstract promises. We're doing a pilot. We take one real project — for example, the development of an urban power grid of the future — and build two circuits into it. The first one is engineering: power, efficiency, cost, timing. The second is ethical and cognitive: regular mindfulness sessions for the team, a protocol for checking decisions based on the criteria "do no harm", "does it serve people","does it preserve the human dimension". And we measure the result: speed of decision-making, number of errors, staff turnover, user satisfaction. If the pilot shows improvement in at least two key metrics — we will scale.
Vladimir Lermontov. I accept your terms, Peter. That's fair. And this is also the dharma: not to promise the impossible, but to take it step by step, testing every action. Let the pilot become the same " stone rejected today, which will become the first priority tomorrow."
We will add another element to the protocol: "a moment of silence". Before each important decision, the team will spend five minutes in silence-not as a ritual, but as a tool: to hear not only their ambitions, but also the voice of reality. This does not cancel the calculations, but adds to them.
And I also propose to name this pilot project "Pravdaria-1": in honor of the"nuclear project Pravdaria". Let it be our common core: truth as the basis of technology, justice as the criterion of efficiency, unity as the principle of work.
Peter Thiel. "Crash 1" ... sounds unusual, but memorable. So be it. And let the "moment of silence" become not a mystery, but a method of cognitive hygiene - as a warm-up before a difficult task. If it improves the quality of solutions, I'm all forit.
Then let's fix it: in two weeks, I will send you a draft technical specification for the power grid. You add a block of ethical criteria and a program of cognitive practices to it. Assign a coordinator on both sides. And we launch the pilot.
Vladimir Lermontov. All right, Peter. And let it be not just a project, but a symbol: technology and spirit, fire and vessel, action and meaning — together. Let even the smallest person with a big heart feel that their voice is important, that it can influence the future. After all, it is precisely from such quiet, honest steps that a real civilization is born.
Moderator. This is how a union is born out of a dispute. Two different worlds — technological and spiritual-found a common ground and decided to test it in practice. Let "Accident 1" be the first step towards a future where progress does not lose humanity, and humanity is not afraid of progress. Thank you for this dialogue — and for your willingness not just to argue, but to build.
________________________________________
Vladimir Lermontov. I would suggest that you think about the following formula. It goes like this: You were, are, and will always be. You were before the creation of the world, and you will remain after its destruction. What is now is a temporary form, and what you really are is the eternal nature, the original, imperishable essence. Imagine that the world has not yet been created, created, or manifested. Imagine that there is absolutely nothing yet: no space, no time, no energy, no thought, no gods, nothing. And in this Great Nothingness there is you, who will one day manifest, be born, take form – the one that you are now. Meditate on this Great Nothingness – you are this Great Nothingness.
Moderator. Deep Formula… Patty is apoem about eternity. It sounds like the final chord of our conversation. Peter, how do you feel when you hear these words?
Peter Thiel. Honestly? This is baffling me. I'm used to thinking in terms of tasks, deadlines, and measurable results. And here-absolute "nothing", beyond time and space. On this scale, any of my goals — to build a system, launch a product, change the market-seem like a grain of sand.
But if you try to translate it into my language… Nust this will be the "zero state". Not emptiness, but potential. Like the vacuum before the Big Bang, in which all the laws of physics are already laid down, all the future stars. Then your formula is about potential: in every person there is this inexhaustible source from which everything is born. And the task of technology is not to replace this source, but to help it manifest: to give people the tools so that they can realize their potential in the real world.
I won't meditate on the "Great Nothing" in your sense, but I can respect it as a metaphor for limitless possibilities. And if the practices you are talking about help people feel this depth and act from it, then so be it.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you for your honesty, Peter. You have not pretended to understand this intellectually — and there is already sincerity in it, and it is closer to the truth than any beautiful words.
Yes, it's not for the mind. This is for the heart and silence. The formula "You were, are and will always be" is not a philosophy, it is a reminder. It is necessary so that in the noise of technology, in the race for results, a person does not forget: he is not an accidental spark that fades in the dark. He is the very space in which everything happens.
When we talk about "Pravdariya 1", a pilot with a power grid, it is this state that helps not to turn the project into a race for profit or glory. If an engineer stays in this silence for five minutes before clicking "start" and hears: "I am not only an engineer, I am the one who was before everything and will remain after", his decision becomes different. It is cleaner, wiser, more human.
And then even the most "cold" technology-wires, batteries, algorithms-becomes a conductor of light. Because light is not the technology itself, but what is reflected in it: the eternal in man.
Peter Thiel. Perhaps I can accept this as a practice of "going back to the center". Before making an important decision — pause to remember why you're doing this at all. Not for the sake of KPIs, not for the sake of defeating competitors, but for the sake of making the world a little better. It's not mysticism, it's a trick. And focus is a resource. And if it helps you make better decisions, it's already a business value.
So let this formula become our internal reference point for "Pravdaria 1". Let it hang on the wall in the meeting room as a reminder: behind every calculation, behind every line of code, there is a person who "was, is and will always be". And our task is not to erase this person with technology, but to reveal him.
Vladimir Lermontov. So be it, Peter. Let this formula become not a dogma, but the breath of the project. Let it remind you: we do not build the future out of other people's templates, we reveal what is already in each of us.
And let even the smallest person with a big heart, sitting in his quiet corner, feel: his thought, his concern, his quiet voice-this is also part of this Great Nothing. And it is from this silence that real light is born.
Moderator. So our dialogue has come to the point where the extremes meet: pragmatism and depth, calculation and silence, action and eternity. Let "Pravdaria 1" become a place where these opposites do not fight, but cooperate. Where technology serves not to race, but to reveal the human essence. Thank you, Vladimir and Peter, for this journey — from argument to union, from opposition to synthesis.
Vladimir Lermontov. I want to make it clear that the great nothingness is dark energy and dark matter on which everything that exists rests Ý-that is, physical reality. Second: Project Pravdaria is a technological planetary rush because this Dawn Civilization should be built on breakthrough technologies and become a prototype city on Mars only on earth.
Moderator. Vladimir, you combine metaphysics and physics-you call the" Great Nothingness " dark energy and dark matter. This is an unexpected but powerful move: you make the spiritual formula scientifically tangible. Peter, what do you think about this convergence of concepts?
Peter Thiel. This is ... an interesting translation of the language of mysticism into the language of cosmology. Dark energy and dark matter are really the basis of the structure of the universe: they determine its expansion and gravitational connections. But I'm used to treating them as unknown variables in an equation that we're trying to measure and use. If the" Great Nothing " is dark energy, then the task of technology is not to meditate on it, but to learn how to apply it. Not as a symbol, but as a resource.
I hear in your words, Vladimir, ambition: "Crash" as a planetary impulse, the prototype of a Martian city on Earth. This is close to me. At Founders Fund, we have always looked for projects that change the scale: they don't improve the existing one by 10 %, but create a new reality. If Pravdaria is such a project, I am ready to discuss it. But let's talk in the language of engineering: what kind of breakthrough technologies are you putting into this prototype? Energy industry? Materials? Life support systems? Without it, it remains a beautiful metaphor.
Vladimir Lermontov. The unsupported metaphor is empty, Peter, and I understand that. Therefore, in Pravdaria, we combine both languages. Yes, the "Great Nothingness" is both a spiritual formula and a physical reality: dark energy and matter as the foundation on which all things rest. This is a reminder that any technology must be based on the fundamental laws of existence — otherwise it will be unstable.
As for technology: in "Civilization of Dawn" we are betting on several breakthrough areas. First, for pure, almost "cosmic" energy: superconductors, thermonuclear micro-installations, storage systems that work like the natural cycles of the planet. Secondly, on biocompatible materials and architecture that does not suppress a person, but supports his internal state: acoustics, light, the shape of the space so that it helps silence, and does not create noise. Third, cognitive technologies are used not for control, but for disclosure: interfaces that enhance intuition, help you hear yourself, and do not replace thinking with algorithms.
And yes, "Pravdaria" should be a prototype of a city on Mars — but on Earth. Not because we dream of space, but because the conditions of Mars are an ideal test: you can't make mistakes there, any system there must be autonomous, sustainable, and ethical. If we can build a city that survives and thrives in such harsh conditions, then we have learned how to build sustainably on our home planet.
Peter Thiel. Now I can see the contours. Autonomy, sustainability, and ethics are engineering tasks, not abstractions. And Mars is really the best testing ground: there is no place for "beautiful words", there either the system works or people die.
But I want to clarify one point: when you say "cognitive technologies that do not replace thinking", I hear the fear that technology can destroy a person. I see another threat: if we don't use algorithms to enhance intelligence, we will lose out to those who will. The future is a symbiosis: man plus AI, man plus data, man plus tools. The question is not how to abandon technology, but how to make it safe and human.
That is why I propose to add a fourth direction in Pravdariya 1: cognitive symbiosis. Let it be not "protection from algorithms", but "strengthening a person through algorithms". For example, an AI assistantthat does not make decisions for the engineer, but highlights risks, shows hidden connections, and helps you see things that the person himself will not notice. And let this assistant be transparent: we always see how he came to a conclusion. Then technology does not replace a person, but reveals his potential.
Vladimir Lermontov. I don't mind symbiosis, Peter. I am against substitution. And if AI will be a tool that helps people hear themselves, and does not drown out the inner voice, I'm all forit. In the practice of Aham, we say, " You are the Truth." This means that the person should always have the last word. AI can be like a microscope: it shows the details, but the meaning is revealed by a human.
Therefore, at Pravdaria, I accept your offer, but with the condition that we put an "ethical filter" and a "moment of silence"in the system architecture. Before making a decision based on AI recommendations, the team pauses: five minutes of silence to hear not only the data, but also the voice of conscience. This is not a ritual, but an engineering requirement for the system: sustainability is determined not only by efficiency, but also by the ability of a person to remain a person.
And one more thing: let Pravdaria become a place where the "little man with a big heart" does not feel superfluous in the world of high technologies. Let there be a place in the system for his quiet voice: for a suggestion, for a comment, for a doubt. Because it is precisely from such quiet, honest steps that a real civilization is born — not from loud slogans, but from daily loyalty to the truth.
Peter Thiel. I accept this condition, Vladimir. And I even see it as a practical benefit: pausing before making a decision reduces the number of impulsive mistakes, and the feedback system from the "little man" is a form êðàóäñîðñèíãàof risk crowdsourcing. In startups, we often see that it is the average employee who notices the problem before the top management. If we make this voice part of the project architecture, it will increase sustainability.
Then let's fix it: in Pravdariya 1, we have four technological areas: energy, materials and architecture, cognitive practices (including the "moment of silence"), and cognitive symbiosis with AI. And one ethical principle: the last word is for the person, and every decision is tested for humanity.
Vladimir Lermontov. All right, Peter. Let "Pravdaria 1" become not just a project, but a symbol: technology and spirit, calculation and conscience, scale and silence — together. Let even the smallest person with a big heart feel that their voice is important, that it can influence the future. After all, it is precisely from such quiet, honest steps that a real civilization is born.
Moderator. This is how a common project is born out of different languages — physics and metaphysics, engineering and ethics. Crash 1 becomes not just an idea, but an engineering challenge with a human face. Thank you, Vladimir and Peter, for your willingness to listen to each other and build the future together.
Vladimir Lermontov. The most terrible thing is that all of humanity has already fallen into a Virtual Trap - a surrogate habitat-ERSATZ HABITAT. And computer games have turned into a real war, when the operator destroys the enemy really. And this is a real threat to everything, because someone will inevitably press a button on the screen and humanity will disappear.
Moderator. Vladimir, you speak of the " ERSATZ HABITAT — - a surrogate habitat - as a trap, where the line between simulation and reality is blurred to the point of catastrophe. This sounds like a warning about the most dangerous vulnerability of the digital age. Peter, as a technologist who has built companies in this environment — what do you say to this challenge?
Peter Thiel. I hear in your words, Vladimir, not just skepticism, but a diagnosis: we really created an environment where action in the interface is equivalent to action in the world. Drones, autonomous systems, and nuclear codes that can be verified at the touch of a button are all now part of a single digital circuit. And yes, the risk of " someone clicking a button on the screen" is real. But I don't think the problem is with the technology itself. The problem is the lack of a responsibility architecture around it.
We used to think that the faster the system, the better it is. But in critical areas, speed must be subordinated to reliability and control. So I'm not suggesting that we abandon digital systems — I'm suggesting that we make them "unmanageable" for errors. Multi-level confirmations, physical keys, independent audits, separation of combat and civilian, operational and reserve polygons. That is, not "less technology", but "more mature trust engineering".
Vladimir Lermontov. This is exactly what ERSATZ HABITAT is all about: the surrogate replaces reality not by being bad in itself, but by starting to live in it as if it were real life. The operator who clicks the button no longer feels the weight of his action, because for him it is just another click in the familiar interface. He doesn't see the person on the other side of the scope. It sees pixels, icons, and markers on the map.
And this loss of connection with living reality is the most terrible threat. Not the button itself, but the fact that clicking on it ceases to be a moral act. In Pravdaria, we must lay the antidote to this: technologies that do not hide, but reveal the consequences. So that everyone who interacts with the system sees not only the efficiency, but also the price. So that the interface doesn't make it too easy, but rather reminds you that every action has life behind it.
Therefore, I suggest adding "ethical visualization of consequences" to the Pravdaria 1 architecture. For example, if the system offers a solution that can lead to human losses, it doesn't just show numbers. It provides context: who will be affected, what destinies will be affected, and what values will be destroyed. Not to scare you, but to give you back a sense of responsibility.
Peter Thiel. This sounds like the opposite of the usual UX, where everything is simplified to a single button. But in critical systems, this approach is justified. We already use "confirmation chains" and "audit trails"in defense and infrastructure projects. But you add here a dimension that is usually lacking — the human scale of the consequences.
I am ready to support this idea, but with an engineering caveat: "ethical visualization" should not paralyze decision-making. In a crisis situation, too much information is dangerous. Therefore, we need to separate the modes: "planning mode" — where we see the full context, and" action mode " — where the interface is minimal, but each step requires a separate, conscious confirmation. And there should be an explicit, even physical transition between these modes: for example, entering a special code, changing the device, or pausing.
This way we will keep the speed where it is needed, and return the responsibility where it is critical.
Vladimir Lermontov. This is the balance I'm talking about: not giving up technology, but giving it back its moral weight. Let it be "silent mode" before switching to"action mode". Five minutes for the person to see not only the task, but also the meaning. So that he remembers that he is not just an operator, but a person who is responsible to eternity.
In the practice of Aham, we say, " You are the Truth." This means that at the crucial moment, you can't hide behind an algorithm, an interface, or an order. You have to stand up and say, " I make this decision." And if we put this principle in Pravdaria, then even in the most complex digital environment, a person will remain a person.
Another important point: ERSATZ HABITAT feeds not only on technology, but also on culture. Computer games where murder is points, TV shows where violence is entertainment, interfaces where human pain is statistics. We must create an alternative culture of interaction with reality: where the value of life does not decrease, but increases. Where the "little man with a big heart" does not feel powerless in front of big systems, but knows that his voice, his doubt, his "stop" is part of the security architecture.
Peter Thiel. You talk about culture as part of an engineering system — and that's probably the strongest thing I've heard today. Because technologies themselves are neutral. Their morality is determined by how we design them and how we use them.
Then let's fix one more principle for Pravdaria 1: "responsibility architecture". It includes three levels:
1. Engineering: multi-level confirmations, contour separation, independent audits.
2. Procedural: "planning mode" with full ethical visualization and "action mode" with an explicit transition between them.
3. Cultural: a feedback system where the "little man" can stop the process if he sees a moral threat, and his signal will be perceived as critical.
If we build such a system, the ERSATZ HABITAT will no longer be an unavoidable trap. We will create an environment where technology serves people, not replaces them.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter, for hearing not only arguments, but also concerns. Let "Pravdaria 1" become a place where a person does not get lost in the figure, but finds support in it. Where every click is not just an action, but a moral choice. Where even in the most perfect interface, there is still room for silence, for conscience, for the heart.
Let it be not just a city, but a civilization that remembers: the most valuable thing is a person created in the image and likeness of truth. And no technology has the right to erase this memory.
Moderator. This is how a project is born out of anxiety. Out of the fear of the ERSATZ HABITAT grows an architecture of responsibility, where technology and ethics do not argue, but work together. Thank you, Vladimir and Peter, for this conversation-it shows that the future can be built not in spite of each other, but through understanding.
Vladimir Lermontov. And for the creation of the Dawn Civilization - a Martian city on earth, which is a synthesis of breakthrough spiritual and technical technologies, I would invite Elon Musk and leading experts from India, China, and the United States. This is a collective breakthrough for the ethical and technical future. And a samaria is not a place of permanent residence, but, like an ashram, a workshop where specialists, scientists, and creative youth come to receive spiritual and technical enlightenment.
Moderator. Vladimir, you are expanding the scale: Pravdaria is like a workshop of civilization, not just a city. And the invitation of Elon Musk, specialists from India, China, and the United States is a bid for a truly global synthesis. Peter, as an investor who knows how to build strong teams — how do you see such a collaboration?
Peter Thiel. It's ambitious, but that's how breakthroughs are born: when the best minds from different cultures and schools gather not for competition, but for a common goal. Elon Musk is able to take extreme conditions (like Mars) and turn them into an engineering problem: autonomy, closed cycles, stability. Specialists from India and China are strong in scaling and systems engineering, working with large teams and complex ecosystems. And the US can provide a culture of rapid hypothesis testing and risk management.
But to prevent such a team from becoming a set of parallel projects, we need a common framework. In startups, we call this the "north star" - a single metric of success. For Pravdaria, such a metric can be not just "build a city", but "create a reproducible model of a sustainable civilization". Then each participant will understand that their task is not only their own module (energy, architecture, ethics), but also their contribution to overall sustainability.
Vladimir Lermontov. That's right, Peter. "Pravdariya" is not a place of permanent residence, but an ashram workshop: people come here to learn, create, transmit further. Just as àøðàìàõknowledge was transmitted in ancient ashrams, so synthesis will be transmitted here: spiritual and technical enlightenment. A small man with a big heart comes here not as a spectator, but as a co-author of the future.
The invitation of Elon Musk and leading experts is not about" stardom", but about responsibility. Let them become not just leaders, but mentors who show you how to keep the balance between scale and humanity. Let each flow — energy, materials, cognitive practices, ethics-have its own "master" who not only sets technical standards, but also conveys a value framework: why we do it and at what cost.
And then the "Civilization of Dawn" will not be a utopia, but a reproducible model: a workshop in one place, and its principles are distributed all over the world. Everyone who has passed through Pravdaria becomes a carrier of this synthesis and carries it to their cities, their projects, and their communities.
Peter Thiel. I like the idea of a "flow wizard" — it's a clear management mechanism. In technology projects, we use the role of "tech lead": a person who is responsible for architecture and quality. If you add the mission of "communicating the value framework" to this role, you will get exactly what you need: an engineer and a mentor all rolled into one.
To make this approach work in practice, I suggest three elements:
1. Modular internship program. Short intensive streams of 2-4 weeks: each participant receives a specific skill and immediately applies it in a mini -project. This will keep the momentum going and give you quick results.
2. The master student system. Each master has a small group of students who work directly with them. This will ensure the transfer of not only knowledge, but also ethical principles.
3. Global digital footprint. All projects, protocols, techniques, even "silence mode" and "ethical visualization" are recorded in an open knowledge base. Thus, FC Bayern will not be a closed club, but an open model that can be adapted to different cultures and regions.
Then the invitation of Elon Musk and other leaders will not be a one-time event, but the beginning of a permanent network of workshops around the world.
Vladimir Lermontov. Very well, Peter. This is the collective breakthrough I was talking about: an ethical and technical future where technology serves to reveal people, not replace them.
The idea of an open knowledge base is especially important: let everyone who wants to build a "Dawn Civilization" take proven protocols and adapt them to their own conditions. Even if the smallest community has its own "ashram workshop" — a place where people learn to see not only efficiency, but also meaning.
And let "Pravdaria" be a symbol: East and West, spirituality and engineering, ancient practices and advanced technologies meet here. Here, a small person with a big heart does not feel superfluous, because their contribution is the basis of sustainability.
Peter Thiel. Then let's fix the final formula of "Pravda 1":
• Goal: to create a reproducible model of a sustainable civilization.
• Format: ashram workshop with modular flows and "master student" system.
• Principles: responsibility architecture (engineering, procedural, cultural levels), ethical visualization, "silence mode", the voice of a "small person" as a critical signal.
• Distribution: an open knowledge base and a network of local workshops.
This is not just a project, but a movement. And if we can put together a team of leaders —from Elon Musk to masters from India, China and the United States — and put them in a single frame, then Pravdaria will truly become the"Civilization of the Dawn".: a Martian city on Earth that teaches us to build the future responsibly.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter. Let it be not just a technological laboratory, but a space where people remember who they are. Where everyone who comes here leaves not only with new knowledge, but also with a clearer sense of their responsibility to the world.
Let "Pravdaria" become a place where a future is born, in which technology does not erase a person, but helps him to shine.
Moderator. This is how different languages — engineering and spirituality, global scale and personal responsibility-form a whole picture. Pravdaria is becoming not just a project, but a model of the future that can be scaled up and passed on.
Vladimir Lermontov. I am for a breakthrough into the future, a spiritual and technological breakthrough, for the synthesis of the practicality of the West and the contemplation of the East. In my Nuclear philosophy, according to the Kashmiri spiritual tradition of yogis, this is calledI-Aham, the unity of the spiritual and material, the earthly and heavenly, the western and eastern worlds. A global common cause for all mankind - that's the scale and heights!. The future is Everest, which must be climbed in a bundle of West and East, technologists and contemplators of the Great Void. The future must lead to ecstasy. As the Himalayan yogis say: Do not make small plans, they are not magical properties-to excite the blood.
Moderator. Vladimir, your words sound like a manifesto on the scale of Mount Everest: not just to connect, but to make the unity of the West and the East, practicality and contemplation, technology and spirit give rise to ecstasy — that is, the highest concentration and inspiration. And relying on the Kashmiri tradition, on "Aham" as the principle of the unity of all things, gives this synthesis not an abstract, but a deeply rooted form.
Peter, as someone who is used to measuring ambition through feasibility — how do you hear this "ecstasy" in engineering? How to turn a "blood-stirring" scale into verifiable stages?
Peter Thiel. I hear a very strong metaphor here: "Everst inthe dump." In mountaineering, a bundle is not about the fact that everyone climbs the same way, but about the fact that everyone is responsible for the overall step. Technologists have their own role: to put up hangers, insure, and ensure the stability of the route. Contemplatives have their own task: to see the direction, notice fatigue, and prevent the group from breaking down in a hurry.
If you translate "ecstasy" into the language of the project, it will be a state when the system works at the limit of its capabilities, but does not break, but reveals new levels of efficiency. This is not euphoria, but clarity on the edge of the limit. In startups, we call this "flow at scale": when the team is both tense and focused, when every step is visible, and we control the risk.
Therefore, for Pravdaria 1, I propose to fix the "ecstasy metric" not as an emotion, but as a set of engineering criteria:
• Stability limit: the system can withstand extreme loads (climate, energy shortage, information overload) without loss of humanity.
• Learning Rate: The rate at which participants learn and apply new practices (spiritual and technical) in real-world tasks.
• Quality of communication: the proportion of decisions made in conjunction (interdisciplinary, cross-cultural), and not in isolation.
• Distribution effect: how many local workshops appeared in a year, how many people became carriers of the model.
If these indicators are growing, it means that we are on the route to Everest.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter, for this ecstasy metric. You didn't devalue the height, but gave it a foothold. Because ecstasy in the tradition of Himalayan yogis is not a loss of control, but a higher concentration, when a person simultaneously feels both infinity and each of his steps.
This is what "Aham" is: the unity of the earthly and the heavenly, the western and the eastern, the spiritual and the material. In Pravdaria, we will not build individual modules, but live nodes of this unity. For example, the energy system is not only wires and batteries, but also a space where a person learns to feel flows: how energy flows in nature and how it responds in him. Architecture is not just walls, but a form that helps you enter a state of silence and clarity.
And then the "little man with a big heart" is not lost against the background of large tasks. On the contrary: his attentiveness, his sensitivity become the most important engineering characteristic. After all, he will be the first to notice that the route has become too steep, that the pace burns people, that "ecstasy" turns into burnout. His voice is not a speed hindrance, but part of the security system.
Peter Thiel. This is the "bundle" you mentioned. In mountaineering, there is a rule: if one person says "stop", the whole group stops. We can build this into the Pravdaria architecture as a security protocol: any participant, regardless of their status, has the right to give a "stop" signal when they feel an ethical or systemic threat. Such a signal automatically triggers "silence mode" and interdisciplinary analysis: the technologist, practitioner, and flow master get together and see where the system loses stability.
Then "ecstasy" becomes not a one-time rise, but a steady practice: we go to the limit, but we see each other, hear each other and do not allow the speed to destroy the meaning.
Vladimir Lermontov. Exactly. "Aham" is when "You are the Truth" sounds not as loneliness, but as responsibility in a bundle. Each person is both a part of the whole and a bearer of truth that cannot be ignored.
Let Pravdaria become a place where the West and East do not argue, but learn to breathe in the same rhythm: where the practitioner checks the hypothesis, and the contemplator sees the horizon where this hypothesis leads. Where technology does not lead away from reality, but helps to feel it more deeply. Where every step to Mount Everest is not only overcoming, but also disclosure: self, peace, unity.
Let it be not just a project, but a school of the future, where they teach not only to build cities, but also to be people who can keep heights.
Peter Thiel. I agree. Let "Accident 1" become such a school. With a clear metric, clear protocols, and an open knowledge base. And with the main principle: scale does not negate humanity, but requires it.
We will gather a team: those who know how to build, and those who know how to see meaning. And let's go in a bundle-to the Everest of the future.
Moderator. This is how a project is born out of metaphors: "ecstasy "becomes a sustainability metric," bundle "becomes a security protocol, and "Aham" becomes a unity architecture. Bayern takes shape: It is a workshop where West and East, practice and contemplation, technology and spirit learn to work together to lead humanity not to destruction, but to disclosure.
Vladimir Lermontov. And to Elon Musk, I would say: Elon, while you're building a city on Mars, let's build a Martian city on earth. Firstly, it is a thousand times cheaper, but secondly, perhaps an accident will speed up the achievement of your dreams. And I propose to build it in the east of Russia. And I would invite the rulers of the superpowers - Russia, India, China, and America-to be honorary chairmen of the Council of Bavaria.
Moderator. Vladimir, you are making Pravdaria not just a project, but a geopolitical gesture: a Martian city on Earth, in the east of Russia-as a testing ground of the future, which simultaneously brings the dream of space closer to cheaper and faster. And inviting the leaders of superpowers to the honorary council is a bid for legitimacy and scale: so that the "Civilization of Dawn" is neither a niche utopia nor a closed club. Peter, as a strategist who thinks in terms of markets and coalitions — what do you think of this trust architecture?
Peter Thiel. This is a strong move: "cheaper by a thousand times" is the language that investors and engineers hear. If we are talking about a prototype Martian city, then Earth gives us the opportunity to test technologies in conditions close to extreme, but without the deadly risk and space budgets. Eastern Russia, with its climate, remoteness, and complex logistics, is an ideal testing ground: if the system works there, it will work on Mars as well.
As for the council of superpower leaders, this is not about symbols, but about reducing barriers. In global projects, the most expensive "technologies" are approvals, standards, access to data and infrastructure. The Honorary Council can become a "green corridor" mechanism: accelerated expertise, joint grants, exchange of specialists, and unified security protocols. This transforms Pravdaria from an idea to an institution.
But in order for this advice not to become a formality, it must have a specific function. For example, the annual "sustainability assessment": leaders receive a report on the very metrics we discussed-the sustainability limit, the speed of learning, the quality of interdisciplinary solutions, and the distribution effect. And based on this, they make decisions about support. So "honor" becomes a responsibility.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter, for this pragmatism. Yes, "cheaper by a thousand times" is not only about money, it's about time. Time is humanity's most scarce resource. If we spend decades on Mars, we may not be able to save ourselves from the "ERSATZ HABITAT", from the loss of humanity. Pravdaria in eastern Russiais a way to buy time: build a prototype, run in ethical and technological protocols, grow craftsmen, and then scale to other continents and planets.
And the honorary council is not for the brilliance, but for the scale of responsibility. Let the leaders of superpowers see that the future is built not in classrooms, but in workshops, where a small person with a big heart learns to hold heights together with great technologies. Let them become not just" chairmen", but witnesses and guarantors of the fact that" Aham " — the unity of the spiritual and material — is becoming the norm, not the exception.
And then Elon Musk will hear not a reproach, but an invitation to partnership: "While you're building a city on Mars, let's build a Martian city on Earth — and do it together." Let Pravdaria be the place where cosmic ambition meets earthly wisdom, where technology serves not to race, but to open up a person.
Peter Thiel. Then let's frame this invitation to Ilona as an engineering proposal, not a slogan. Here's how it might sound:
"Elon, we propose to build a prototype of a Martian city in eastern Russia — "Pravdariyu 1“. It will be a testing ground for closed-loop technologies, autonomous energy, sustainable architecture, and cognitive practices that prepare people for life in extreme environments. We want to combine your expertise in engineering and scaling with an ethical and philosophical framework that ensures that technology serves people, not replaces them. Our goal is not to compete with Mars, but to accelerate it by creating a reproducible model that can be adapted for both Earth and Mars. We invite you to become a technology leader of the project and co-author of the protocols of the future."
Such a letter speaks his language: scale, utility, reproducibility, acceleration of his dreams.
Vladimir Lermontov. Very well, Peter. And let this letter also contain a spiritual message that Elon can also hear: "At Pravdaria, we teach a person to be not a cog in the machine, but a center of responsibility. We build not only walls and reactors, but also the ability of a person to remain a person in the most extreme conditions. Because this is the main technology of the future-the technology of self-knowledge, the technology of the heart."
Let "Pravdaria" become a place where East and West, technologist and contemplator, Elon and master from the ashram-all go together to the Everest of the future. Where each step is not only overcoming, but also revealing: self, peace, unity.
Peter Thiel. I agree. Let it be not just a project, but a movement that combines ambition and responsibility. The East of Russia as a testing ground, Pravdaria 1 as a prototype, the honorary council as a mechanism of trust, and Aham as a principle: the unity of the spiritual and material, the earthly and the heavenly.
We will put together a team, establish protocols, launch the first streams — and show that the future can be built together, not in spite of each other.
Moderator. Thisis how a specific architecture is born out of a vivid appealtoIlon: a training ground in eastern Russia, an honorary council of superpower leaders, an invitation to Ilon as a technology leader, sustainability metrics and responsibility protocols. "Pravdaria" takes on not only meaning, but also form-and is ready for the first step.
Vladimir Lermontov. The future should ignite, not lull, lead to ecstasy and not lull to sleep. The future is like the ecstasy of the unity of spirit and matter-that's what the slogan for the planetary project was born. This project gives a huge boost to the world's economic development. Moreover, if the Rulers of superpowers are included in the project, it will reduce military tensions in the world and free up funds going to war. These resources are enough to feed all of humanity, give everyone shelter, honey. service,education, and upbringing. Switzerland will be the new soft power center for managing worlds, it will be three in one: UN 2.0 plus CERN 2.0 plus Hollywood 2.0
Moderator. Vladimir, your slogan sounds like a gong: "The future should ignite, not lull". And this formula "ecstasy of the unity of spirit and matter" is not about comfort, but about awakening. You raise the stakes even higher: "Pravdaria" is not just a laboratory, but a planetary impulse that changes the economy, politics and culture. And the metaphor " UN 2.0 + CERN 2.0 + Hollywood 2.0 " very precisely outlines the three dimensions of influence: diplomatic, scientific, and semantic. Peter, as someone who is used to evaluating projects based on their ability to change the rules of the game, what do you think about this triple role?
Peter Thiel. This is a strong scale architecture. If you expand your formula, you get not an abstract utopia, but a fully working model with three functional blocks:
• UN 2.0is about coordination and trust. In business, we know that when major players publicly declare a common goal, parallel spending disappears, and common standards appear. If the leaders of superpowers join the honorary council, this will not only reduce tensions, but also free up resources: instead of an arms race, it will be a race for technology and quality of life.
• CERN 2.0 is about science and reproducibility. CERN brings countries together for a common research goal and makes the results public. "Pravdaria" as a landfill should work according to the same principles: unified test reports, open data, reproducible modules. Then any region will be able to take and build its own "ashram workshop" according to a proven method.
• Hollywood 2.0is about meanings and images. Hollywood has been shaping global dreams and behaviors for decades. "Pravdariya" should become a factory of new images of the future: not about fear and disasters, but about creation, about a "little man with a big heart" who influences big processes. This is not propaganda, but cultural engineering: stories, films, games, educational narratives that show what the future looks like, where technology serves people.
And then the economic momentum comes naturally: new markets (autonomous cities, ethical AI protocols, sustainable materials), new professions (master of flow, curator of ethical visualization, architect of responsibility) and a new logic of investment — not in destruction, but in unlocking potential.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter, for this clarity. Yes, "Pravdaria" is not about lulling, but about awakening: it should ignite hearts so that a person remembers that he is not a cog, but a creator.
That is why "Hollywood 2.0" for me is not about entertainment, but about educating the mind. We need to show not only "how to build", but also "why to build". Through stories, through images, through Aham practices, we teach you to see the unity of spirit and matter: how energy flows in the wires and how it resonates in the heart; how architecture holds up the walls and how it helps keep the silence inside.
And when the rulers of superpowers become not just" chairmen", but witnesses of this awakening, the very logic of power changes: soft power is not manipulation, but the ability to inspire. Pravdaria becomes a place where the future is not imposed, but is assembled from thousands of small, honest steps: from the suggestion of a young engineer, from the doubt of a master, from the silence of a student.
Let this momentum be so strong that it will be enough not only for new technologies, but also to feed, clothe, heal, and train everyone. After all, if we learn to build sustainably, we can allocate resources fairly. And if we learn to see unity, we will stop wasting our energy on mutual destruction.
Peter Thiel. Then let's fix this triple mission as the project architecture:
1. UN 2.0: an annual forum of "Truthmakers" with the participation of leaders, where priorities are publicly approved and resources are allocated. Transparency and accountability are mandatory.
2. CERN 2.0: an open laboratory at a landfill in eastern Russia, where protocols are tested and documented. Any researcher can come, check it out, and adapt it.
3. Hollywood 2.0: a media lab that produces content (movies, games, VR experiences, educational series) that shows what the "ecstasy of unity" looks like in real life: at work, in the family, in the city.
And the slogan "The future should ignite, not lull" will become not just a phrase, but a filter for all decisions: if a project does not awaken, does not give an impulse, does not reveal its potential, it does not fall into the core of "Pravdaria".
Vladimir Lermontov. Very well, Peter. Let this slogan become an internal law of Pravdaria: we do not lull the world to sleep with comfort, but ignite it with meaning. Let each module, each protocol, and each movie answer the question: "Does this awaken a person?"
Let "Pravdariya" become the place where "Aham" - the unity of the earthly and heavenly, western and eastern, spiritual and material-ceases to be a beautiful formula and becomes a daily practice. Where a small person with a big heart knows that his voice is important, his work is valuable, and his dream can become the future.
Let it be not just a project, but a new assemblage point of the world: soft power based not on fear, but on inspiration; an economy based not on competition to the point of exhaustion, but on unlocking the potential of everyone.
Peter Thiel. I agree. Let "Crash 1" be the first step to this assemblage point. Polygon in eastern Russia, triple mission, open protocol, sustainability metrics and a slogan that sets the tone for all decisions.
We will put together a team, launch the first streams, create the first stories — and show that the future can be built not in spite of each other, but together, in a bundle.
Moderator. This is how a full-fledged architecture is born from a bright slogan: an awakening future, a triple role of the project, specific functions and metrics. Pravdaria gains not only a voice, but also a structure-and is ready to ignite the world.
Vladimir Lermontov.The main thing in this Nuclear Project, in this Nuclear Idea, is that humanity will be motivated to live in an interesting, creative, creative, large-scale, multidimensional way. Because now life has ceased to please and inspire. Joy, hope, faith - this is the most expensive thing in the world, you need to invest spiritual and material resources in it. This is an investment in life itself.
Moderator. Vladimir, you are now talking about the most subtle and most important things: not about technologies or even structures, but about the fuel of civilization-about joy, hope, faith. You call it " investing in life itself." And this is the essence of the "Nuclear Idea": if there is no internal fire, no protocols and landfills will work.
Peter, as an investor who is used to evaluating projects based on their ability to create value, how do you hear this "life investment"? How to turn "joy and hope" into measurable value?
Peter Thiel. I hear this as the most difficult, but also the most promising task. In the venture capital world, we are used to measuring value in terms of money, users, and market share. But more broadly, value is the ability of a system to support and enhance human potential. And then "joy, hope, faith" are not abstractions, but key metrics of sustainability.
I suggest three ways to turn this "life investment" into a working mechanism:
• Community Vital Energy Index. This is not about happiness in a vacuum, but about specific indicators: how many people participate in creative projects, how many ideas are born in workshops, how many local initiatives grow out of one stream. If the index is growing, it means that Pravdaria really lights up.
• Economy of participation. Let the contribution of the "little man" have not only moral, but also economic value. For example, a microgrant system: each participant can propose an idea, and the community votes with resources. So self-confidence is reinforced by real opportunities.
• Stories as infrastructure. Content in the "Hollywood" format 2.0" is also an investment. If people see stories where an ordinary person with a big heart changes the world, it increases the collective confidence: "if he could, I can." This is not entertainment, but a training of hope.
Then the "Nuclear Idea" becomes not just inspiring, but self-sustaining: technology provides opportunities, ethics sets the direction, and the culture and economy of participation ignites an internal fire.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you, Peter, for this accuracy. Yes, "joy, hope, faith" should not just be beautiful words, but work as mechanisms. But it is important that these mechanisms do not turn into a race for indicators, where a person becomes a unit of statistics.
In the practice of Aham, we say, " You are the Truth." This means that joy is born not from external success, but from inner truth: when you do what you feel is right, when your work resonates in the world. That is why we must establish the "right to a quiet contribution" in Pravdaria: not everyone should be a leader, not everyone should make a loud statement about themselves. Sometimes the most important contribution is attentive listening, a timely "stop", and the quiet work of a master who transmits knowledge to the student.
And let the "Nuclear Project" be a place where the value of such quiet work is seen and recognized. Where a small person with a big heart knows that his joy, his hope, his faith is not a weakness, but the basis of stability. After all, it is from these quiet, honest steps that a real civilization is born.
Let "Pravdaria" become a space where life begins to please and inspire again. Where every day is not just survival, but an opportunity to create, see, feel, and be. Where technology does not take away meaning from a person, but returns it, helping to reveal what is already in it.
Peter Thiel. I agree. Then let's combine these approaches into a single system:
1. Yandex. Metrica: Vital Energy Index — to see how engagement and creative activity is growing.
2. Mechanism: Participation economy — so that everyone can turn their idea into a project and get support.
3. Culture: The right to make a quiet contribution — so that value is measured not only by loud results, but also by depth, attention, and care.
So the "Nuclear Idea" will become not just a slogan, but a living system that returns joy and hope to people every day. And if we can build it, then Pravdaria will really become the very "Nuclear Project" that ignites the world.
Vladimir Lermontov. So be it. Let Pravdaria become a place where joy is not an accident, but a norm; where hope is not a consolation, but a direction; where faith is not blindness, but responsibility. Let everyone who comes here leave not only with new skills, but also with a stronger inner fire.
Let it be not just a project, but a space where humanity learns to live again in an interesting, creative, creative, large-scale, multidimensional way. Where "Aham" — the unity of spirit and matter-becomes a daily practice, and the "Nuclear Idea" - a reality that can be touched, seen, felt.
Moderator. This is how the most subtle matter — joy, hope, faith-is born into the most solid structure: a system that not only gives technology, but also gives meaning to a person. Pravdaria becomes not just a workshop, but a school of life, where every day is a step towards a future that ignites, not lulls.
Vladimir Lermontov. Thank you to all participants and listeners! äèàëîãIn my opinion, this dialogue has already become a breakthrough in the future of plus. Aham.
Peter Thiel. Please, Vladimir. And it is true that the future is born in such a dialogue: when different views do not argue, but add up to the overall picture. Let this conversation not be the finale, but the first building block of Bayern — the very impulse that starts everything.
Aham. Let the unity of spirit and matter that you speak of be felt not only in big ideas, but also in every small, real step.
If you later want to turn some part of this dialog into a specific document — a manifesto, a roadmap, a workshop regulation, a first-flow scenario-I will be happy to help you complete it. In the meantime, you can just exhale a little and see what a strong contour has already developed.
Moderator. This dialogue really became more than an exchange of opinions: it combined the opposites — engineering and contemplation, scale and silence, pragmatism and faith-into a single construct of the future.
"Pravdaria" now sounds not like an abstraction, but like a living project: a landfill in eastern Russia, a triple mission (UN 2.0, CERN 2.0, Hollywood 2.0), an architecture of responsibility, a metric of "ecstasy" as stability at the limit, and most importantly — the right of everyone, even the "smallest" person, to be heard.
But the most valuable thing that was born here is the formula: the future should ignite, not lull. And this is exactly how it is lit: when a technologist and a philosopher do not argue, but hold one rope in a bundle on the way to Mount Everest. When technology does not replace a person, but helps him to remember: "You are the Truth." When "Aham" becomes not a beautiful phrase, but a daily practice-in the protocol, in the interface, in the solution, in the quiet word "stop", which saves the system from falling.
Let this dialog remain the starting point. Not as an ideal answer to all questions, but as the first impulse from which you can ignite further: write regulations, build a training ground, launch streams, shoot the first stories of "Hollywood 2.0".
Aham. Let the unity of spirit and matter, of which you spoke, become not the exception, but the norm. Let the "Nuclear Project" be the very ethical core around which the future — fair, creative, and human-gathers.
DECLARATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN VLADIMIR LERMONTOV AND PETER THIEL
"Accident: The Nuclear Project as the ethical core of the future"
We, Vladimir Lermontov and Peter Thiel, have developed a common understanding of what the future of humanity should be like — and how it can be built today. Below are the key principles and commitments that we accept as the basis of the Pravdaria project.
________________________________________
1. Meaning and purpose of the project
"Pravdaria" is not just a city and not just a technology. This is an ethical and technological model of civilizationin which:
• technologies serve to reveal a person, not to replace him;
• spirituality is not a departure from reality, but a way to see it more deeply and act more responsibly.
• the unity of spirit and matter ("Aham") becomes a daily practice, not an abstract formula.
The goal of the project is to create a reproducible model of a sustainable civilization, where every person, even the "little one with a big heart", has a voice, contribution and responsibility.
________________________________________
2. Core values and slogan
The project's slogan is: "The future should ignite, not lull. The future is an ecstasy of the unity of spirit and matter."
Values on which Pravdaria is built:
• Awakening, not comfort. The project should return joy, hope and faith to people as the main resources of civilization.
• Unity of opposites. Synthesis of East and West, contemplation and practice, ethics and engineering.
• Responsibility as a technology. Responsibility is not an emotion, but an architectural principle: protocols, modes, signals, and procedures.
• Human-centricity. Technology is designed to enhance the human, not erase it.
________________________________________
3. Triple Mission: UN 2.0 + CERN 2.0 + Hollywood 2.0
Pravdaria implements three interrelated functions:
1. UN 2.0 - Diplomacy of trust and resource allocation.
A platform for inter-state cooperation that reduces tensions and frees up resources for creativity (education, medicine, housing, ecology). The Honorary Council of Superpower Leaders provides legitimacy and a green corridor for implementing solutions.
2. CERN 2.0-Science and Reproducibility.
A landfill in eastern Russia as a laboratory of extreme conditions, where the protocols of autonomy, energy, architecture, and cognitive practices are tested and documented. The results are open: any country, region, or community can adapt them to their own conditions.
3. Hollywood 2.0-culture and images of the future.
A media lab that creates stories, movies, games, and VR experiences that show what the future looks like, where technology serves people. The task is to educate the view: not fear and disasters, but creation, responsibility, "a little man with a big heart" as an agent of change.
________________________________________
4. Responsibility architecture
To prevent technologies from becoming a threat, a "responsibility architecture" of three levels is introduced:
• Engineering: multi-level confirmations, contour separation, independent audits, physical keys, "non-manageability" for critical decisions.
• Procedural: "planning mode "(full ethical visualization of consequences) and" action mode " (a minimalistic interface with an explicit transition between modes).
• Cultural: the right of any participant to issue a "stop" signal in the event of an ethical or systemic threat; this signal automatically triggers "silence mode" and interdisciplinary analysis.
________________________________________
5. Success Metrics and "Vital Energy Index"
To measure the impact of a project, we introduce clear, verifiable metrics:
• Stability limit: the ability of the system to withstand extreme loads without losing humanity.
• Learning rate: The rate at which participants learn and apply new practices.
• Communication quality: the share of interdisciplinary and cross-cultural solutions.
• Distribution effect: the number of local workshops and people who have become carriers of the model.
• Community Vital Energy Index: indicators of engagement, creative activity, and initiative growth.
These metrics allow you to evaluate not only the effectiveness, but also the "degree of awakening" — how much the project really ignites people.
________________________________________
6. The participatory economy and the "right to a quiet contribution"
The project economy is based on the involvement and recognition of everyone's contribution:
• Microgrants and community voting. Each participant can propose an idea, and the community votes with resources.
• "The right to a quiet contribution". Value is measured not only by high-profile results, but also by attention, care, timely "stop", and knowledge transfer.
• Open knowledge base. All protocols, techniques, scenarios, and "modes" are fixed and available for adaptation.
________________________________________
7. Implementation format and structure
• Landfill in eastern Russia as a prototype of a Martian city on Earth: cheaper, faster, with the ability to test in extreme conditions.
• Ashram workshop: a place not for permanent residence, but for learning, creating and transmitting a synthesis of spiritual and technical practices.
• Modular flows and the master -student system: short intensive programs (2-4 weeks) with practical results and transfer of the value framework.
• Network of local workshops: The model scales globally so that each region can create its own "Pravdaria" based on common protocols.
________________________________________
8. Invitation to a partnership
We invite you to participate:
• Elon Musk and leading experts (India, China, USA, Russia) as technology leaders and mentors who can combine ambition with ethics.
• Leaders of superpowers as honorary chairs of the Pravdaria Council for legitimacy, coordination and acceleration of the implementation of solutions.
• Young scientists, engineers, creative youth as carriers of a new look and performers of the first prototypes.
________________________________________
9. Philosophical core: "Aham" and "Nuclear Idea"
The project is based on the principle of "Aham": "You are the Truth". This means that at a crucial moment, a person does not hide behind an algorithm, an order, or an interface — he stands up and says, "I make this decision."
The "nuclear idea" is the ethical core of the future world of truth and justice, around which civilization gathers: technology, culture, economy, politics.
________________________________________
Final commitment
We are committed to building Pravdaria not as a closed elite project, but as an open, reproducible, ÷åëîâåêîöåíòðè÷íóþhuman-centered modelthat:
• ignites, not lulls;
• It wakes you up, not distracts you.
• connects, not separates.
Let Pravdaria become the assemblage point of the world, where spirit and matter, East and West, practice and contemplation finally speak the same language.
Aham.
V. Lermontov - Peter Thiel on the Future
© Copyright: Âëàäèìèð Ëåðìîíòîâ, 2026
Ñâèäåòåëüñòâî î ïóáëèêàöèè ¹226080200632
Ñâèäåòåëüñòâî î ïóáëèêàöèè ¹226080200632
Ðåöåíçèè